Skip to main content

No Emergency, No Wall – House & Senate Oppose Discriminatory Bogus Emergency Declaration #NoBorderWall UPDATES

Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, said on Sunday that he would support a resolution that would overturn President Trump’s declaration of a national emergency at the southern border, appearing to provide the crucial vote needed for the Senate to pass the measure. . . .  “I cannot support the use of emergency powers to get more funding” for a wall along the border with Mexico, he wrote, “so I will be voting to disapprove of his declaration when it comes before the Senate.”

Mr. Paul joins three other Republican senators — Susan Collins of Maine, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska — in backing the resolution. His support appears to provide the slim majority Democrats need to send the measure to the president’s desk, offering a stinging repudiation of the declaration.

The House, largely on party lines, passed the resolution on Tuesday, and under the National Emergencies Act of 1976, the Senate is required to vote on the resolution in the coming weeks. Mr. Trump has said he would veto the measure, and it is unlikely that either chamber could muster the two-thirds majority needed to override a veto.

But with several lawsuits already filed in court, a resolution of disapproval from Congress — the simplest mechanism for lawmakers to challenge a declaration — could help opponents of the declaration.

Read the rest of this story in the New York Times . . .

The emergency declaration violates the separation of powers, and discriminates against people of color and low income people, including Native Americans, in US border communities, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. The declaration is not narrowly crafted to serve a compelling state interest. There are less discriminatory means to accomplish legitimate ends of national security. Don’t be silent on discrimination.